Featured Post

How To Deal With Gaza After Hamas

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Bernier's courageous stand on language is of immense value

MONTREAL - Maxime Bernier said what many Quebecers who speak French or English know to be right. Everyone in Quebec should learn to speak French and be able to use it in everyday life. But the world is too small for ambitious Quebecers to be able to live their lives entirely in French, and it impoverishes Quebec to deprive them of the chance to learn English.    
The parts of Bill 101 that regulate the display of commercial messages in English and that regulate the use of languages on commercial Internet sites are small-minded, vindictive and foolish.

Read the entire column in The Montreal Gazette

The White House addresses shocking HIV/AIDS statistics among America's Black population

Egyptian Blogger/Activist known as "Sandmonkey" reveals identity after police beating



More at abcnews.com

h/t Tarek Fatah

Social Scientist identifies liberal bias among social scientists!

Scientist discovers conservatives are an oppressed minority - at least in the Social Science field

SAN ANTONIO — Some of the world’s pre-eminent experts on bias discovered an unexpected form of it at their annual meeting. 

Discrimination is always high on the agenda at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s conference, where psychologists discuss their research on racial prejudice, homophobia, sexism, stereotype threat and unconscious bias against minorities. But the most talked-about speech at this year’s meeting, which ended Jan. 30, involved a new “outgroup.” 

It was identified by Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at the University of Virginia who studies the intuitive foundations of morality and ideology. He polled his audience at the San Antonio Convention Center, starting by asking how many considered themselves politically liberal. A sea of hands appeared, and Dr. Haidt estimated that liberals made up 80 percent of the 1,000 psychologists in the ballroom. When he asked for centrists and libertarians, he spotted fewer than three dozen hands. And then, when he asked for conservatives, he counted a grand total of three. 

“This is a statistically impossible lack of diversity,” Dr. Haidt concluded, noting polls showing that 40 percent of Americans are conservative and 20 percent are liberal. In his speech and in an interview, Dr. Haidt argued that social psychologists are a “tribal-moral community” united by “sacred values” that hinder research and damage their credibility — and blind them to the hostile climate they’ve created for non-liberals. 

“Anywhere in the world that social psychologists see women or minorities underrepresented by a factor of two or three, our minds jump to discrimination as the explanation,” said Dr. Haidt, who called himself a longtime liberal turned centrist. “But when we find out that conservatives are underrepresented among us by a factor of more than 100, suddenly everyone finds it quite easy to generate alternate explanations.” 

The entire article is at The New York Times

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Laughs from the animal world



Plea Bargain Advertising Episodes - 1 & 2



Toronto's United Church of Hate to hold Sea Hitler fundraiser

This Saturday at 7 pm, Bloor Street United Church will be holding a fundraiser for the Sea Hitler, the boat a group of Canadian Islamists and pro-Marxist groups want to sent to support Hamas-ruled Gaza.

The Bloor Street United Church at 300 Bloor Street West in Toronto has faced allegations of being a home for anti-Semitism masked as "social justice" in the past.

It is only a couple of blocks away from the St. Paul Trinity Centre which houses groups like James Clark's anti-Israel Canadian Peace Alliance and the International Socialists and recently played host to the shill for Iran's dictatorship, George Galloway. Their two steeples along a close stretch of Toronto's Annex district are like anti-Israel versions of J.R.R. Tolkien's twin towers of Mordor and Isengard.

In 2008,  Bloor Street United hosted an event promoted by the discredited Canadian Arab Federation that according to The Jewish Tribune, displayed "viciously antisemitic reading material."

Now they are hosting another fanatical anti-Israel event to raise funds to help destroy Israel's ability to prevent Iranian arms smuggling to Hamas, a group designated as a terrorist organization by the government of Canada.

This event is sponsored by the anti-Semitic Canadian Arab Federation along with Bloor Street United's "Social Justice" Committee. A quick perusal of this committee's information suggests a concept of social justice that lines up better with the followers of Karl Marx than those of Jesus Christ.

Is Religion a Tool of the Devil?

Religion has been giving God a bad name for all of recorded history, and probably before that too.

Abram, who later became Abraham and fathered what would become Judaism, Christianity and Islam, left his home because he was fed up with the local religion. So he took off and started a new one. And it has continued in much the same way since then.

The fact is that there are some astoundingly good people who are religious. The three Abrahamic religions are based on noble principles of justice and charity. Most people who devote their lives to their religion practice those principles to a greater degree that the average person. Critics of religion who point to all the evil done in the name of God by religion naturally provoke the sincere souls who practice the humanitarian aspects of their faith and participate in a community of others who do the same.

That religion has corrupt, evil practitioners no more makes it an inherently malignant institution than Tammany Hall made American democracy inherently malevolent. It is, however, undeniable that lots of very, very bad people do very bad things in the name of their religion, while claiming they are doing the work of God or Allah.

But in the increasingly heated debate between atheists and defenders of traditional religious practice, there is yet another approach.

.....................


From the outlook of a believer, any obstacle between a person and God is an evil impediment.

Is organized religion something that fosters closeness to God, or is it a deceptive obstruction that encourages sublimation of our relationship with the Almighty in favour of a tellurian authority, making it a metaphorical tool of the devil?

To examine that question, let us begin with another: What is the most precious gift that God bestowed on Mankind?

Other animals have great strength, remarkable speed or the ability of flight, any of which in a human would be considered superpowers. It is man’s ability to reason, to learn, and to build upon this body of knowledge that distinguishes our species and has given us the ability to dominate and shape our world.

Yet organized religion frequently requires us to discard this gift that God gave us in favour of faith. But not a faith in God or our individual ability to be guided by Him. Religion often demands we stifle reason in favour of catechism. In effect, telling us to affirm obedience, not to God, but to humans claiming to know His will. Many of whom, throughout history, have had rapacious motives. What could be more an instrument of the devil?

Religion abhors atheism, but does God? If God lives, He is not an imaginary friend who ceases to exist if you don’t believe in Him. God can employ atheists to His purpose just as He does believers. In fact, atheists are frequently more moral, better people than many who profess religious beliefs.

God does not require worship and he does not require one insignificant being in His incomprehensibly large universe to defend his reputation from another.

The biblical story of Babel in the Book of Genesis describes God’s confounding the language of the peoples of the earth, ”that they may not understand one another's speech.” But people have the capacity to learn other languages. What they can learn but not accept is another’s creed.

What if the story of Babel is not about God separating and setting the peoples of the earth against each other with language, but with religion? And what if that was not the work of God, but of the devil?

Tower of Babel
MC Escher
The idea that religion can stand in the way between us and our relationship with God is not a new one.

Religions frequently become institutions concerned more with their temporal authority than being a conduit for the divine spirit. The Reformation and Luther’s 95 Theses were a reaction to corruption within a Medieval and early Renaissance Catholic Church which sold, for money, not only ecclesiastic authority but tickets to Heaven. Indeed Christianity emerged as a reaction to the stagnation and rigidity of Judaism.

The founders of the first monotheistic religion understood how codification of religious practice countered God’s design that our relationship with Him should be evolutionary. Judaism separated the Written Law, consisting of the Five Books of Moses, the books of the Prophets, and Psalms, from the Oral Law. Jewish tradition teaches that the penalty for writing the Oral Law was death. The motive being that old beliefs and traditions were supposed to die out as our progressive comprehension made them irrelevant.

The Babylonian Talmud was recorded in violation of the law to preserve knowledge that Diaspora Jews feared would be lost. By doing so, they created a template changing Judaism from an evolving body of understanding into a time capsule of antiquated rituals. And all major religions operate from similar templates.

If we are God’s children, then evolution can be seen as the maturation and education of mankind. Religion is the invention of answers of which the inventors have no way of knowing. As a caveman would not be able to comprehend the principles of advanced physics, we are far from the ability to comprehend neither the nature nor the will of God as it applies to the universe. Yet the arrogant presumption of that capacity is the embodiment of what religion represents.

To criticise religion is not a denigration of religious people. But just as Marxism has individual adherents who are good people, in practice, that system always leads to totalitarianism. So is religion a poison tree that sometimes produces beautiful fruit.

This is not an argument to discard faith. It is an argument to have faith in God and His ability to guide you personally and directly without an intermediary.

Every soul is its own cathedral, each mind its own bible. As God’s creations, we have the individual capacity to be a prophet and messiah to ourselves, if only we learn to listen and to use the gifts He gave to all of us.

200 Men Arrested For Being Gay In Bahrain

Perez Hilton reports:

As many as 200 gay men may have been arrested in the poorly decorated small middle-eastern island country of Bahrain for attending a GAY WEDDING!!!!   
WFT???????? 
The men, mostly from Bahrain and Gulf countries, were arrested Thursday on the charge of “conduct against public morals.” 
“According to police sources some of the men were allegedly drunk, and others were described as wearing women’s clothing and make up. The police are now said to be checking if any have a history of ‘debauchery or sodomy."  

No doubt things'll get better once they have their revolution and The Muslim Brotherhood takes over.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Test your morality

This test, created by social psychologists shows you how you compare to conservatives and liberals and where you fit in.

You might surprise yourself.

Cat vs Alligators..and guess who wins

A pretty amazing feline feat

Watch Iranium for free now!

UPDATE: The free online viewing period has been extended, so go ahead and click the play button below, enter your email and enjoy a free viewing of the film.

Iranium, the movie whose screening at the National Archives in Ottawa was cancelled due to what are believed to be threats from Iranian embassy staff is available to be seen online today (February 7)  and tomorrow only.

There are screenings of this film for $18 or more coming up, so this is your chance to learn about Iran's nuclear threat and save a few bucks!

Just click the play button in the widget below, enter your email address and you can start viewing.

This is an informative, important and scary movie that may affect your entire outlook on the dangers the free world faces from Iran.

Toronto Mayor Ford delivers on another promise

The National Post reports that The City of Toronto "intends to recommend seeking competitive bids for curb-side pick up west of Yonge Street, to the Etobicoke border, plus privatize more of the litter vacuum operations and litter and recycling pick up in parks. The written notice meets the city’s obligations, under the collective agreement, to provide three month notice of its intention to put the recommendation before City Council for consideration."

During last fall's campaign, Ford promised to examine the privatization of garbage collection, which will result in savings plus ensure reliability of service. Etobicoke, the western borough of Toronto, which contracts out garbage pick-up, was the only area  not affected by the last municipal garbage strike.

Many people speculate that the next great social justice battle in Canada will be against the corrupt civic unions. Employees who want civil service jobs are compelled to join unions which then turn around and use union dues to support terror sympathizers and foreign communist regimes.

While theoretically democratic, civic unions are not infrequently headed by people who make Hosni Mubarak look like Thomas Jefferson.

Most civil servants want to serve the public and get paid for an honest days work while not breaking the backs of the citizenry of which they are a part. But the people who campaign for and devote excessive amount of time to union activities are often interested in the type of power they are not able to attain through career advancement.

Whether civic unions are serving the interests of the nation or even their own membership are questions that will be looked at as the backlash against them appears to be growing.

Quebec MP Maxime Bernier on Bill 101


"..people know who they are and that it’s not the government’s role to create and protect a national identity. I used Quebec as an example and said that we don’t need Bill 101 to protect the French language.  
I did not expect to create such a storm by expressing my belief that we should let people act like free and responsible individuals, including when it comes to protecting their language, instead of relying on government coercion to do it for them.  
This has since generated several denunciations from public figures in Quebec and a wave of angry comments on the Internet.  
Some people say I am not a “real Quebecer” and are accusing me of “attacking Quebec” simply because I want to be more popular in the rest of Canada. They seem unable to conceive that it’s possible to have a different position than theirs on the basis of fundamental principles.  
My position is this: Yes, it’s important that Quebec remain a predominantly French-language society. And ideally, everyone in Quebec should be able to speak French. But we should not try to reach this goal by restricting people’s rights and freedom of choice."

Read the whole thing at The National Post

Obama makes Chris Matthews ashamed as an American?! Chris Matthews??!!

About Obama: "There is a transactional quality to the guy that is chilling."

About Egypt: "We don't have any Plan B! Where is our plan?"

Actually Chris, it sounds like Obama did have a Plan B. It involves the Muslim Brotherhood.



Sammy Davis Jr. singing the Hawaii 5-0 theme!?!

Yup!  It's called You Can Count on Me:



And just so your mind doesn't get too warped, here's The Ventures doing the original instrumental version:

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Time for our government to start an open dialogue about Multiculturalism

First Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel and now Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron has spoken out against the failure of multiculturalism as a state policy.

As the fractious nature of groups which resist integration into the mainstream has shown, state-sponsored multiculturalism has been a divisive force rather than strengthening for those societies which employ it.

America's Melting Pot does not seek to rub out immigrants' ethnic and cultural identities. As the world's top destination for immigrants, The Unites States has vibrant communities reflecting cultures from all over the world. The difference is that they come to America to be Americans, rather than immigrants who come to Canada to be, for example, Venezuelans in Canada.

Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau made Canada the first country to adopt multiculturalism as official policy. As Liberal member of federal parliament John McKay observed:

"Mr. Trudeau’s vision of official multiculturalism was largely a bi-product of his constant struggle against Quebec separatism...Trudeau .. saw official multiculturalism as a useful tool in his ongoing battle to diminish the threat of Quebec separatism, because in disentangling culture from language, he hoped there would be less emphasis on the notion of Canada being composed of ‘two nations/deux nations’, and more focus on Canadians as individuals whose first languages may be English and French, but had various different ethnic origins. In effect, he used immigration and multiculturalism to further his own political agenda for the country."

Many Canadians now agree that what began as a strategy to diminish separatism has backfired. The Quebec separatist movement is still strong. In some measure, it remains so as a backlash against the idea of Quebecois culture being further diluted by multiculturalism.

For English Canada, what was intended to be a policy to promote inclusiveness has deteriorated into a tyranny imposing minority values on the majority.

Within schools, where history is now a subject barely addressed, multiculturalism is taught as an enshrined characteristic of Canadian identity. In a nation that defines itself by the ways in which "it is not American", multiculturalism, by virtue of not being the American Melting Pot,  has become a religion whose dogma cannot be questioned.

But the apparent failings of multiculturalism have raised questions that cannot be avoided.

It's the responsibility of the government to have an open discussion about policies that affect everyone in this country. If we are on the wrong course, it is our duty to correct it, not continue simply because it's the way things have been done for the last two generations. If, as a nation, we can't adapt to contemporary realities, we will be destined to get swept away by them.

Canadians who want to see our government seriously examine whether we should enact changes to official multiculturalism should let Prime Minister Stephen Harper (pm@pm.gc.ca)  and Jason Kenney, the Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism  (kennej@parl.gc.ca) know how they feel.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Some cute Super Bowl ads










This could be Roseanne Barr's best screen performance ever:




WTF?!? Groupon presents exploitative capitalism at its worst..I mean best..well, either way, it's pretty funny:

Communism: The Board Game

WARSAW, Poland – You won't get to build hotels or collect rent in a new Polish board game reminiscent of Monopoly. In fact, you may be lucky even to get a pair of shoes.   
Poland's state-run National Remembrance Institute has created the new game — called "Kolejka," which means queue or line — to help young Poles understand the hardships of life under communism.   
In the game, players are tasked with buying a number of goods, but a lack of deliveries, shortages and the connections competitors have to communist authorities turn the task into a string of frustrations.   
"We want to show young people and remind the older ones what hard times these were and what mechanisms were at play," said Karol Madaj, the game's creator.  
Players try to buy basic goods but food supplies run out before they reach the counter. If a bed is needed, they may be offered stools instead. Players needing the shop's last pair of shoes can get edged out by someone holding a "mother with small child" or "friend in government" card.   
"We want to show how it was when you lost your chance because someone with high connections jumped the line," said Madaj, a 30-year-old who still remembers spending long hours with his mother in lines.   
"We may laugh at it today, but it was not funny for them, when they were wasting their lives in lines."



Read the rest at Yahoo! News

Fanaticism and radicals - LIve from Montreal

You can watch the People's Commission Network conference through live video streaming by clicking the play button below:

UPDATE: the live coverage is over and they're broatcasting something about agriculture and food