Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Thursday, July 10, 2014
Iran's Spanish-language propaganda service uses antisemitic comic to condemn insults against religion
Americans and Jews use film in the service of the devil. That's the apparent message of a cartoon published by Iran's Spanish-language propaganda service, HispanTV.
Ironically, the cartoon was being used to illustrate an article condemning a movie about the treatment of the child bride of Islam's founder, Mohammed that the Iranian news service described as "blasphemous," and condemns "offending religion in the guise of free speech."
Iran has made a concerted effort in recent years to make inroads in Latin and South America, forming informal alliances with Marxist-ruled Venezuela and using that country as a base for its proxy terror-group, Hezbollah.
Labels:
anti-Semitism,
Iran,
Islam,
movies,
propaganda,
USA
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Vomit-inducing tripe from rabble.ca about the Washington Naval Yard shootings
Days like this remind me of the value of the guiding philosophy behind Eye on a Crazy Planet:
The capture below is from the heavily moderated discussion forum at the website published by the spouse of federal NDP leader Libby Davies:
If you have the stomach for more, you can see the rest of their vile tripe HERE
"I have always been among those who believed that the greatest freedom of speech was the greatest safety, because if a man is a fool, the best thing to do is to encourage him to advertise the fact by speaking." - President Woodrow Wilson
The capture below is from the heavily moderated discussion forum at the website published by the spouse of federal NDP leader Libby Davies:
If you have the stomach for more, you can see the rest of their vile tripe HERE
Sunday, August 25, 2013
Pro-Muslim Brotherhood protest in Calgary blames MidEast strife on "Americans and Zionists." CBC omits that part from its coverage
In the coverage of the event that tells what actually happened, Jonathan Halevi who speaks Arabic, reports:
The CBC told a different tale:
h-t Blazing Cat Fur
Tharwat Muhammad Anwar Nafi’ (ثروت محمد انور نافع), a member of the dissolved Egyptian Upper house, the Shura Council, also attended the protest. In his fiery speech he argued that Israel and the US are behind the military coup and the turmoil in the Middle East.
Here’s an excerpt of his speech: “The Egyptian armed forces, designated to protect the people, are now carrying out massacres in Egypt under the auspices of Israel and USA. What happened in Egypt and what is happening in all Arab states is being done under the auspices of the Zionists and Americans to crack down on any possible democracy or any democratic thinking in the Middle East.”
The CBC told a different tale:
h-t Blazing Cat Fur
Labels:
anti-Semitism,
Calgary,
CBC,
democracy,
Egypt,
Israel,
Muslim Brotherhood,
Protest,
Syria,
USA,
Zionism
Friday, June 21, 2013
Survey Finds that 41 Percent of Small Business Owners Have Frozen Hiring Because of Obamacare
A new poll of business owners about how Obamacare has affected employment decisions is positively brutal for the health law.Via CNBC:
More at Reason.comForty-one percent of the businesses surveyed have frozen hiring because of the health-care law known as Obamacare. And almost one-fifth—19 percent— answered "yes" when asked if they had "reduced the number of employees you have in your business as a specific result of the Affordable Care Act."
and also at CNBC
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Obama's Secretary of Defense Nominee Hagel cracking under Senate pressure
Inhofe, like other senators, zeroed in on Hagel's vote as a senator against labelling the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organisation and imposing sanctions against it.
Hagel said he was one of 22 senators who took the same position.
He was against the move because the US has "never, ever designated a part of a legitimate government, a state" as a terrorist organisation.
Hagel said the vote would have permitted the US to use force against Iran and America was already in two wars at the time. He noted that John Kerry, the new secretary of state, Joe Biden, now the vice-president, also voted against the measure in the Senate.
Hagel was pressed about his opposition to unilateral sanctions against Iran a decade ago, and said that was a different time. He said he regards Iran a state sponsor of terrorism.
Inhofe asked Hagel: "Why do you think the Iranian foreign ministry so strongly supports your nomination for secretary of defense?".
Exasperated, Hagel responded that he had no idea. "I have a difficult time enough with American politics," he said.
Several senators picked up on Hagel's statement in an interview for a book that the "Jewish lobby" intimidates many members of Congress. Hagel later apologised for using "Jewish lobby", saying he should have referred to "pro-Israel lobby".
Senator Roger Wicker pressed Hagel. "Do you stand by your statement they succeed in this town because of intimidation?" he said.
Hagel said he should have described it as influence not intimidation.
Senator Lindsey Graham picked up on the issue when he demanded that Hagel name any senator who has been "intimidated by the Israeli lobby" and identify a "dumb thing" Congress has been pressured to do by groups supportive of Israel. "I can't give you an example," said Hagel.
Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Chuck Schumer’s Hagel problem
![]() |
| Chuck Hagel (left) with then-senator Barack Obama in 2007 |
There probably is no more important senator on the Chuck Hagel nomination than Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). Hagel could still lose even if Schumer supports him (either because of a GOP filibuster or near-unanimous disapproval from Republicans and a few breakaway Democrats up for reelection in 2014). However, there is no way, given Schumer’s prominence on Israel issues and the pressure his decision would generate on Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and other pro-Israel Democrats, that Hagel could survive if Schumer opposed him.
So far Schumer has been entirely, eerily noncommittal, suggesting that he was either not consulted or that his consultation was ignored by the White House. The most disturbing headline Tuesday for the pro-Hagel team (aside from praise for Hagel from the Chinese government and the mullahs in Iran) was this: “Schumer Won’t Predict if Hagel Will Be Confirmed.”
More at The Washington Post
h/t Werner Cohn
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Robert Bork and the birth of modern hyper-partisanship
Rivalry and competition between political parties is the essence of democracy. It's as old as politics and will never cease. But at the core of the legislative process in western democracies, there used to be the idea that the interests of the pubic should take precedence over the opportunity to get one upmanship over the opposition. The Democratic Party's' treatment of Robert Bork during his 1987 nomination to the US Supreme Court changed all that.
It also changed the nature of the highest judicial appointments in America from taking the best and the brightest to the quietest and most pliable.
Bork, who died last week at the age of 85, was nominated by President Ronald Reagan to replace retiring Justice Lewis Powell. By any conceivable legal standard, Bork was eminently qualified to take a seat on the highest court. As an Appellate Judge he wrote the majority of the judgments for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia from 1982 to 1988 without once having a decision overturned by the Supreme Court. His Achilles Heel was that he was outspoken.
A prominent legal scholar and thinker, he has published books and written decisions that made his position on the law and the Constitution clear.
After almost two full presidential terms of Ronald Reagan riding roughshod over the Democrats, and with another election looming, Ted Kennedy and his party decided to flex their muscles to try to reassert their place in the power sphere. Bork was the opportunity they saw to get there.
Bork was publicly vilified, lied about and ultimately rejected as a Supreme Court justice. And though they won the battle, it was a Pyrrhic victory. An enduing, spiralling, petty tit-for-tat in Congress has lasted for the last quarter century that has made cooperation between the Republicans and Democrats increasingly difficult.
And since 1987, Presidents knew that strong, publicly stated opinions of outstanding legal minds would make them assailable to the vicious, unfounded attacks launched by Kennedy and his colleagues against Bork. So less forthright, less brilliant, and less vulnerable jurists who were quietly vetted by presidential administrations became Supreme Court appointees.
Bork's defeat became America's open wound.
With his death, now might be an appropriate time to look back and see if there is a way to start healing a still debilitated process.
It also changed the nature of the highest judicial appointments in America from taking the best and the brightest to the quietest and most pliable.
Bork, who died last week at the age of 85, was nominated by President Ronald Reagan to replace retiring Justice Lewis Powell. By any conceivable legal standard, Bork was eminently qualified to take a seat on the highest court. As an Appellate Judge he wrote the majority of the judgments for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia from 1982 to 1988 without once having a decision overturned by the Supreme Court. His Achilles Heel was that he was outspoken.
![]() |
| President Ronald Reagan with Robert Bork |
After almost two full presidential terms of Ronald Reagan riding roughshod over the Democrats, and with another election looming, Ted Kennedy and his party decided to flex their muscles to try to reassert their place in the power sphere. Bork was the opportunity they saw to get there.
Bork was publicly vilified, lied about and ultimately rejected as a Supreme Court justice. And though they won the battle, it was a Pyrrhic victory. An enduing, spiralling, petty tit-for-tat in Congress has lasted for the last quarter century that has made cooperation between the Republicans and Democrats increasingly difficult.
And since 1987, Presidents knew that strong, publicly stated opinions of outstanding legal minds would make them assailable to the vicious, unfounded attacks launched by Kennedy and his colleagues against Bork. So less forthright, less brilliant, and less vulnerable jurists who were quietly vetted by presidential administrations became Supreme Court appointees.
Bork's defeat became America's open wound.
With his death, now might be an appropriate time to look back and see if there is a way to start healing a still debilitated process.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
US will attack Iran in 4-5 months if they don't give up nukes
Washington has decided to negotiate directly with Iran, and will resort to military force in four or five months if diplomacy can’t persuade Tehran to relinquish its alleged atomic weapons program, Israel’s Channel 10 News reported on Tuesday night, quoting a senior American official.
Plus: Canada imposes sanctions against Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps
Plus: Canada imposes sanctions against Iran's Revolutionary Guards Corps
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Iran,
Israel,
Nuclear Weapons,
USA
Monday, November 19, 2012
Saturday, November 10, 2012
US Ambassador David Jacobson on the Canada-US relationship
Taped on Oct 23
(the sound quality is poor, but audible)
(the sound quality is poor, but audible)
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Is the NDP accusing Obama of running a repressive regime?
In his last election campaign, Jack Layton said he was `Canada`s Barack Obama` (obviously wishful thinking from a socialist with with a lot less intellect and charisma than the former Harvard law prof).
Is Layton`s party now accusing Obama of running a repressive regime from which refugees need sanctuary?
Is Layton`s party now accusing Obama of running a repressive regime from which refugees need sanctuary?
Labels:
Army Deserter,
Barack Obama,
Canada,
Iraq,
Jack Layton,
NDP,
refugees,
USA
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Democrats pull a fast one on God and Jerusalem
Democratic Convention Chair, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa called for a voice vote approving of former Ohio Governor Ted Strickland's motion to change the party's platform:
The vote required a two thirds majority to pass. Mayor Villaraigosa had to call the vote three times and said in his view, the motion passed and it is now the policy of the Democratic Party.
But listening to the vote, it sounded as if the nays, if not more numerous were at least as loud as the yeas.
“I come before you today to discuss two important matters related to our party’s national platform,” Strickland said from the convention floor. “As an ordained United Methodist minister, I am here to attest and affirm that our faith and belief in God is central to the Aamerican story and informs the values we’ve expressed in our party’s platform.”
“In addition,” he continued, “President Obama recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. And our party’s platform should as well.”
The vote required a two thirds majority to pass. Mayor Villaraigosa had to call the vote three times and said in his view, the motion passed and it is now the policy of the Democratic Party.
But listening to the vote, it sounded as if the nays, if not more numerous were at least as loud as the yeas.
Thursday, July 5, 2012
In case you doubted Niall Ferguson knows what he's talking about
This video is well worth watching. It was recorded about a year and a half ago just after the fall of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. In it British historian and author Niall Ferguson precisely predicted the events that have now unfolded with the recent election of the Muslim Brotherhood candidate for Eqypt's presidency.
What is also worth noting are his criticisms of US President Obama's dismal failure to have a handle on foreign policy. That applies now as much as it did when he made these remarks.
What is also worth noting are his criticisms of US President Obama's dismal failure to have a handle on foreign policy. That applies now as much as it did when he made these remarks.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
New York Democrats may nominate the next Cynthia McKinney
Former Black Panther Charles Barron is a huge fan of murderous dictators like Robert Mugabe and Muammar Gaddafi, he thinks schools should teach Ebonics, he is contemptuous of Jews, and he hates Israel.
Apparently, the Democrats are terrified that he may actually get the party`s nomination for Congressional candidate in Brooklyn`s 8th District and make the national party look like idiots.
h/t Doug D.
Apparently, the Democrats are terrified that he may actually get the party`s nomination for Congressional candidate in Brooklyn`s 8th District and make the national party look like idiots.
h/t Doug D.
Friday, May 11, 2012
More conspiracy theories from the Muslim world - Turkish newspaper blames suicide bombings in Syria, Iraq and Pakistan on Israel and the US
One thing these idiots failed to observe is that Jews and Christians aren't promised 72 virgins in the afterlife for blasting themselves to oblivion in a murderous rampage.
The Turkish daily Aydinlik said that suicide bombings represent a way of incitement carried out by the CIA and Mossad agents in Iraq, and are applied now in Syria, Lebanese daily Al-Benaa reported.
(Ahlul Bayt News Agency) - “CIA and Mossad agents have carried out - and still - various attacks in several countries including Iraq, Pakistan and Libya,” Aydinlik stated in a report published Monday.
The report made it clear that the agents have bombed mosques during the occupation of Iraq in order to incite Shiites against Sunnis and vice versa.
“Those agents have achieved their goal where most of their operations were targeting Shiite and Sunnite mosques. All bombings were declared suicide attacks, while the suicide bombers were announced killed, but the fact is contrary to what was claimed,” the daily added.
The newspaper pointed out that CIA and Mossad are adopting the same method now in Syria in order to thwart the plan of UN envoy to the country, Kofi Annan.
Labels:
anti-Semitism,
CIA,
conspiracy theories,
crazy,
Israel,
Mossad,
Pakistan,
Syria,
Turkey,
USA
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Financial Post's Lawrence Solomon praises bloggers for telling the truth about Global Warming
The world would have to drastically realign its outlook if the three countries with the world's largest oil deposits were the United States, China and Israel. That realigned world may be ours in less than a decade if new technologies can fulfil expectations of exploiting known oil shale deposits.
At the Advocates for Civil Liberties' Canada and the New Middle East conference last week, Financial Post columnist Lawrence Solomon discussed the amazing possibilities presented by newly developed technology that can produce fuel from oil shale at $40 per barrel. Within as little as five years, these deposits may be fully actualized, meaning energy self-sufficiency and profits for countries like the US and China, which have the world's largest and second largest identified oil shale deposits. For countries like Israel that ranks 3rd with it' deposits amounting to as much as 500 billion barrels, there is the potential to become one of the world's major petroleum exporters.
The result would be a massive shake up of the Middle East's geo-political reality. Oil prices would likely plummet, and middle eastern countries ruled by despots propped up by oil revenues would see their economies collapse along with those nations' social cohesion.
Islamist terror is for the most part funded by oil revenue, particularly in the case of Saudi Arabia. In a unsavoury deal between two devils, Saudi Sheiks fund Wahhabi Islamic extremism abroad as a form of protection pay-off that sees their rule at home face little challenge. Iran uses its petro-dollars to fund its Revolutionary Guard Corps that brutalize the domestic population and proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah who engage in terrorist activities throughout the middle east and Latin America.
If oil shale from the US, Canada, which also has major deposits, and other free countries becomes a major source of energy and revenue, it would see the leaders of countries like Venezuela and Iran without the means to stir up trouble outside their borders, while having to face new ones within them.
The new reality posed by this development makes it all the more clear why environmental groups are so closely aligned with groups who advocate for Iran and are so sympathetic to Islamists. They have common interest in trying to sabotage the West's ability to achieve energy independence.
One of the interesting aspects that the Financial Post's Solomon observed is that while much of Global Warming alarmism is a sham, you would never know that from reading most mainstream media, like Canada's most popular dailies the Globe and Mail and Toronto Star. If one had to rely exclusively on those media, one might not realize that there are as many climate scientists (as opposed to fruit fly geneticists) who disagree as agree with the theory that global warming is the result of human activity.
Solomon noted that it is actually through blogs that the most accurate and balanced information about Global Warming science is available. It must be that bloggers are less intimidated by the prospect of falling into disfavour from the likes of Al Gore and David Suzuki. Of course, bloggers generally have less to lose, as they are already unlikely to receive invitations to caviar and champagne parties at Sundance, so the threat of having them withdrawn is not particularly intimidating.
At the Advocates for Civil Liberties' Canada and the New Middle East conference last week, Financial Post columnist Lawrence Solomon discussed the amazing possibilities presented by newly developed technology that can produce fuel from oil shale at $40 per barrel. Within as little as five years, these deposits may be fully actualized, meaning energy self-sufficiency and profits for countries like the US and China, which have the world's largest and second largest identified oil shale deposits. For countries like Israel that ranks 3rd with it' deposits amounting to as much as 500 billion barrels, there is the potential to become one of the world's major petroleum exporters.
The result would be a massive shake up of the Middle East's geo-political reality. Oil prices would likely plummet, and middle eastern countries ruled by despots propped up by oil revenues would see their economies collapse along with those nations' social cohesion.
Islamist terror is for the most part funded by oil revenue, particularly in the case of Saudi Arabia. In a unsavoury deal between two devils, Saudi Sheiks fund Wahhabi Islamic extremism abroad as a form of protection pay-off that sees their rule at home face little challenge. Iran uses its petro-dollars to fund its Revolutionary Guard Corps that brutalize the domestic population and proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah who engage in terrorist activities throughout the middle east and Latin America.
If oil shale from the US, Canada, which also has major deposits, and other free countries becomes a major source of energy and revenue, it would see the leaders of countries like Venezuela and Iran without the means to stir up trouble outside their borders, while having to face new ones within them.
The new reality posed by this development makes it all the more clear why environmental groups are so closely aligned with groups who advocate for Iran and are so sympathetic to Islamists. They have common interest in trying to sabotage the West's ability to achieve energy independence.
One of the interesting aspects that the Financial Post's Solomon observed is that while much of Global Warming alarmism is a sham, you would never know that from reading most mainstream media, like Canada's most popular dailies the Globe and Mail and Toronto Star. If one had to rely exclusively on those media, one might not realize that there are as many climate scientists (as opposed to fruit fly geneticists) who disagree as agree with the theory that global warming is the result of human activity.
Solomon noted that it is actually through blogs that the most accurate and balanced information about Global Warming science is available. It must be that bloggers are less intimidated by the prospect of falling into disfavour from the likes of Al Gore and David Suzuki. Of course, bloggers generally have less to lose, as they are already unlikely to receive invitations to caviar and champagne parties at Sundance, so the threat of having them withdrawn is not particularly intimidating.
Labels:
energy,
Global Warming,
Iran,
Israel,
oil shale,
Saudi Arabia,
terrorism,
USA
Monday, January 16, 2012
Michael Coren: Canada is not Switzerland
It is not because they want peace and pacifism; it is because they want neutrality and, ultimately, the triumph of our enemies.
We saw this during the Cold War when, in the guise of peacefulness, various fellow travellers and leftist agitators actually wanted the Soviets to dominate.
Today we see something similar in the struggle against Islamofascism.
From special interest groups, to writers at the Toronto Star, to commentators on the CBC, we are drenched by waves of anti-American propaganda, explaining the war on terror is a costly failure, and we should be the honest broker in all this and not take sides.
If only we understood Islam, we are told by patronizing dullards, all would become clear.
Well, I do understand Islam, and the Middle East, and unlike these extremists I also understand the U.S.
It’s not about Canada taking sides, it’s about Canada being Canada.
The whole article is at The Sun
Monday, January 9, 2012
Venezuelan Consul General in Miami expelled for helping Iran plan attacks on US
Venezuela has joined its ally Iran in plotting attacks on the USA according to recently published reports.
Now, Livia Acosta Noguera was declared persona non grata by the US State Department and has given her until Tuesday to leave the country. The State Department had said last month it was looking into “very disturbing”allegations that Ms Acosta was a participant in an alleged Iranian plot to launch cyber-attacks on sensitive US national security facilities.
The Spanish language network Univision broadcast an investigative report last month detailing the cooperation between Venezuela, Iran and Cuba to ready terror cells in Mexico and Latin America to launch attacks on the US.
This video is the first segment (in Spanish) of the Univision documentary La Amenaza Irani (The Iranian Threat):
h/t Confessions of a Closet Republican
Now, Livia Acosta Noguera was declared persona non grata by the US State Department and has given her until Tuesday to leave the country. The State Department had said last month it was looking into “very disturbing”allegations that Ms Acosta was a participant in an alleged Iranian plot to launch cyber-attacks on sensitive US national security facilities.
The Spanish language network Univision broadcast an investigative report last month detailing the cooperation between Venezuela, Iran and Cuba to ready terror cells in Mexico and Latin America to launch attacks on the US.
This video is the first segment (in Spanish) of the Univision documentary La Amenaza Irani (The Iranian Threat):
h/t Confessions of a Closet Republican
Labels:
Ahmadinejad,
Cuba,
Hugo Chavez,
Iran,
terrorism,
USA,
Venezuela
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Harper: "Canada has no friends among America's enemies"
For obvious political reasons, the Obama administration has stalled the Keystone pipeline bringing Canadian oil across the U.S. to Texas. This might mollify some in the leftist quadrant of the Democrat's base through the election when, oh look, the pipeline decision will come right after November, 2012. Quelle coincidence!
It will be hard for Obama, if he's still around politically, to kill the pipeline then, so interested doth he claim to be, in enhancing secure petroleum resources.
More at Investors.com
It will be hard for Obama, if he's still around politically, to kill the pipeline then, so interested doth he claim to be, in enhancing secure petroleum resources.
More at Investors.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


