The Penis Is A Social Construct - Peter Boghossian pulls a Sokal Hoax on the Academic Farce That Is Gender Studies
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhn7L3Aq5dn9IK4K2ea6pz5W9Kaq_Rjxq2bKi4RzncNZ3xMbld4y07WQo3Yim4WEhYHGMNjglNmLCl709jfj_l7VOYqYfBD84XOltB7py2K1JGORKQI4L-saIhm55o_1Z0RQzEMZ4WUHw0/s400/Pene.JPG)
It’s been 21 years since physicist Alan Sokal submitted a bogus paper to a special “Science Wars” issue of the cultural studies journal Social Text. His paper, “Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity“, maintained that quantum gravity was a social construct, using many bizarre quotes from postmodern scholars to make its case. Almost immediately after the paper was published, Sokal revealed it was a hoax in an article in Lingua Franca.
The “Sokal Affair” inspired a lot of debate, as well as accusations that Sokal himself was unethical in submitting the paper, but I thought it made its point superbly: much of the social sciences and “culture studies” in academia is intellectually vacuous—a repository for dumb ideas couched in bad prose.
Now we have another hoax: a piece on the “conceptual penis” published in the journal Cogent Social Sciences, self described as “a multidisciplinary open access journal offering high quality peer review across the social sciences: from law to sociology, politics to geography, and sport to communication studies. Connect your research with a global audience for maximum readership and impact.”
Here’s the article;(though it will probably be removed very quickly!). The paper has, however, been archived, and you can find it here.
MORE...
No comments:
Post a Comment